Sunday, June 2, 2019
IT and the Business Cycle :: essays research papers
IT and the Business Cycle There is a regular business cycle, which lasts for about 9 years. The cycle is characterised by a period of growth, then strong growth and then recession. Unfortunately, the cycle isnt exact and it isnt dependable, or else you could make money out of it, by gambling on it. Sometimes it lasts 7 years, sometimes 10 or 11. In the later stages of the last business cycle some odd things were happening. Growth in the US economy was much higher than anyone expected and unemployment much lower. Productivity statistics from the US Government suggested that from 1996 productivity was improving at an average 2.2 percent per year, which was a prominent proceeds on the 1 percent average for the previous 25 years. The point at which productivity turned up coincided with the point at which the cyberspace started to become visible. That may swallow been a coincidence, but there was another strange quirk in the figures. Investment by US companies since 1990 has been sta tic in every area except in IT, where it rose dramatically by a factor of 14 over the decade. And to cap it all, the bulk of the productivity improvement in the US economy was confined to the IT industry itself. In theory, IT should be counter-cyclical and it usually is. The benefit that IT is supposed to deliver is automation. It either cuts damages and/or improves productivity, accordingly. The figures from the US suggest that it was doing the latter in the glorious 90s and particularly in the later years. In the current part of the business cycle it will be cost cutting that matters. The heady days of optimism are over and the era of cautious IT investment has arrived. So what are the information technologies that will do well in this era? Heres one thought. Consider the anomaly of Moores Law. This suggests that CPU power will double every 18 months and it has done just that for over 30 years. rattling Moores law doesnt just apply to CPUs, but also memory, disk, buses and just about every aspect of a computer or network. One would think then, that it would have brought down the cost of computing as a matter of course. However, it didnt have that effect until recently, because most of the accelerated capability was delivered to the PC where its contribution to productivity was minimal.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.