High School District Essay

Declining juicy groom dissolve bulge out identifys protract to reflect on the American facts of lifeal system. Dropout come in for soaring trailtime students confabulate to the event of individuals within the gritty shallow eld range, between 16 to 24 years of age, who cod not enrolled in initiate, obtained a high school diploma, or achieved equivalency documentation when comp bed to the general cosmos for this age range. issue statistical data indicates that the dropout yard decreased by 6 sh atomic number 18 from 15 per centum in 1972 to 9 per centum in 2006. A homogeneous decrease by 2 percent from 11 percent in 2000 to 9 percent in 2006 also occurred.(National pith for provincement Statistics, 2008) there are differing interpretations of the implications of these statistics especially on developments in the educational system. few consider this a positive facial expression on the educational system eyepatch others recognize this as the applicati on of the problems. unheeding of the perspective, the relative dropout run points to improvements in the number of people not enrolling or complete high school as good as an area for further improvement. dropping out from high school has unfavourable consequences to individuals and the broader community.On the part of individuals, majority of those who have dropped out of high school were unable to find jobs or engage in odd jobs (Stanard, 2003). flush if employed, in that location are limited opportunities for career advancement. Income would also belike remain low. (Campbell, 2004) This affects long-term financial security. On the part of communities, the dropout rate means much people likely to become reliant on the social welfare class of the g everywherenment. This also translates into greater risk of exponentiation in alcoholism and drug hire likely to co-occur with criminal activity.(Martin, Tobin & Sugai, 2002) Even with a decreased dropout rate, it is meanin g(a) to cross addressing this issue by getting at the root of the problem. While the dropout rate has declined, there is no throw in the dropout order when considering all inclines. The racial gap over the dropout rate remained the same. (Heckman & LaFontaine, 2007 National Center for Education Statistics, 2008) In comparing the dropout rate among Caucasians and Hispanics, the dissimilitude or gap in drop out rate is 20 percent in 1980 and 19 percent in 2000.Two reasons direct for the nil change in the racial gap over the dropout rate between Caucasians and Hispanics. One is the census bias with Hispanic immigrants who have not graduated from high school include in the statistical data (Christle, Jolivette & Nelson, 2007). This gives rising slope to the issue of the evaluation of statistical measures and variables in determining dropout range. The rise in Hispanic immigrants kept a high dropout rate for Hispanics even if the national dropout rate has declined. another(prenom inal) is school related factors that intellectual the racial disparity in dropout rate at the states and territory levels (Orfield et al., 2004). This means that there are die hard related school factors at the local level that gift to the persistence of a huge gap between the dropout range of Caucasians and Hispanics. One factor is the utter nearly of inclusion or seclusion of minority students in various high schools of antithetic partitions (Heckman & LaFontaine, 2007). Another factor is the lower socio-economic status or high pauperisation rates of minority high school students in various school districts leading to higher dropout rates (Orfield et al. , 2004).There are differences in the causes of dropout rates at the state or district level because of variances in the animated determining factors and the impact of these factors on racial disparity in dropout rates. State or district level studies are important in identifying and understanding the root cause of th e racial gap in dropout rates. In the state of California, there is a dumbness of dropout rates in certain schools. There are 2,462 high schools in the state but 100 of these high schools contribute 40 percent of students dropping out from high school.Of this number, 25 high schools account for 21 percent of the dropout rate. The mean rate of high school drop outs in the state is 3. 5 percent and most of the high schools in California constitution a dropout rate that is lower or equal to the average. Of the total number of schools in California, 76 schools have a to a greater extent(prenominal) than 50 percent dropout rate. However, there are 662 high schools in the state without any(prenominal) dropouts. This zero dropout rate in these high schools is due largely to the non-traditional schools. In the several(predicate) high schools, the dropout rate relative to race varies.(One coke, 2008) Even at the state level, there are disparities in the dropout rate per school when con sidered relative to the varying racial composition of the school and other nearly related school factors. As such, understanding the disparities in dropout rates relative to race requires study at the specific district level. The largest high school district in California is Kern County High drill District. The district covers 22 educational institutions luck at least 37,000 students and employing 3,500 educational workers.The school district ranks as the 17th in terms of the highest number of dropouts, with 1st as highest. A large number of the nation in this school district is Hispanic comprising 68 percent, followed by Caucasian do up 44 percent. More than one-quarter of the population are living beyond the poverty line. (Orfield et al. , 2004) The racial composition of this school district provides an insightful locale in studying why there is disparity in the dropout rate between Caucasians and Hispanics.This district equal a good venue in testing the applicability of dif ferent perspectives on the reasons for the racial gap for high school dropouts and the identification of other reasons for the differences in the dropout rates specifically between Caucasians and Hispanics.ReferencesCampbell, L. (20032004). As unfaltering as the weakest link Urban high school dropout. High School Journal, 87(2), 1625. Christle, C. A. , Jolivette, K. , & Nelson, M. C. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 325-339.Heckman, J. J. , LaFontaine, P. A. (2007). The American high school graduation rate Trends and levels. IZA password Paper No. 3216. Bonn, Germany The Institute for the breeding of Labor (IZA). Martin, E. , Tobin, T. J. , & Sugai, G. M. (2002). Current information on dropout prevention Ideas from practitioners and the literature. Preventing School Failure, 47(1), 1018. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). The condition of education 2008. Department of Education. Retrieved Ap ril 12, 2009, from http//nces. ed. gov/FastFacts/display. asp? id=16.One hundred California high schools account for more than 40 percent of the states dropouts. (2008, February 21). Reuters. Retrieved April 12, 2009, from http//www. reuters. com/article/pressRelease/idUS82976+21-Feb-2008+BW20080221. Orfield, G. , Losen, D. , Wald, J. , & Swanson, C. B. (2004). How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA The civilized Rights Project at Harvard University. Stanard, R. P. (2003). High school graduation rates in the join States Implications for the counseling profession. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 217222.